
Artificial Intelligence technology can have a major impact on faculty and their classes, research, and academic endeavors. New developments are advancing so quickly that questions regarding course objectives and assignments, and academic integrity and authorship, abound. A primary resource for UAB teachers is found in the Using AI in the Classroom Workshop series.
The following resources are provided to help faculty understand AI, its current capabilities and limitations, and its impact and implications for faculty and students.
Syllabus Guidance
The following statements are provided as examples for teachers for designing and teaching their courses. Clear and concise course policies and explicit instructions for course assignments and assessments related to the use of generative AI are key to compliance with the standards of academic integrity.
A report on AI and the UAB community opens a new website, prepared by the Provost-appointed AI Working Group, includes various suggested syllabus statements that can be used in your courses.
-
Sample Statements for All Teachers
Academic Integrity: Academic misconduct is present in an academic work wherever AI assistance has been used when unauthorized, or when authorized, has not been disclosed as required. Such behavior is considered deceit and a violation of UAB’s shared commitment to truth and academic integrity. Deceit constitutes academic misconduct and is subject to review according to UAB’s Academic Integrity Code.
Expect changes: The developments around generative AI are in flux and the rules that are expressed in this syllabus may need to change on short notice. This may affect the contents of assignments, as well as their evaluation.
-
Sample Statements for Teachers Allowing Use of AI with Attribution
General Writing: In principle you may submit material that contains AI-generated content, or is based on or derived from it, if this use is properly documented. This includes, for example, drafting an outline, preparing individual sections, combining elements, removing redundant parts, and compiling and annotating references. Your documentation must make the process transparent – the submission itself must meet our standards of attribution and validation.
Open Book Exam/Quiz: The use of AI tools is permitted, provided you follow our standards for attribution, validation, and transparency.
Encourage Use of AI with Three Principles Generative AI: Artificial Intelligence that can produce contents is now widely available to produce text, images, and other media. We encourage the use of such AI resources to inform yourself about the field, to understand the contributions that AI can make, and to help your learning. However, keep the following three principles in mind:
- An AI cannot pass this course.
- AI contributions must be attributed and edited for accuracy.
- The use of AI resources must be open and documented.
- To pass this course: AI generated submissions cannot achieve a passing grade. This is necessary to ensure you are competent to surpass generative AI in the future – whether in academia, research, the workplace, or other domains of society. If this cannot be achieved, if you are not able to maintain control of the rules, you are entering an unwinnable competition. To provide a baseline that is specific for the course, we will produce, analyze, and provide AI-generated sample solutions. Your task will be to surpass them.
- Attribution: You are taking full responsibility for AI-generated materials as if you had produced them yourself: ideas must be attributed, and facts must be true.
- Documentation: A portion of your term grade will evaluate your documentation of AI use throughout the course. By keeping track of your AI use and sharing your experiences, we all gain understanding, identify potential issues in this rapidly changing field, and discover better ways to use the resources for our objectives.
-
Sample Statements for Teachers Prohibiting the Use of Generative AI
Generative AI Use Is Prohibited: The use of generative AI is strictly prohibited in this course. Closed Book Exam/Quiz The use of AI tools is not permitted.
General Writing: The use of generative AI tools is not permitted on writing assignments in this course. By submitting a writing assignment, you attest that you are the only and original author.
Computer Code: The use of generative AI tools to develop code is strictly prohibited in this course. By submitting an assignment, you attest that you are the only and original author of the code submitted.
The Sentient Syllabus Project
This project provides resources on AI technology in higher education. It is a public-good collaborative to enrich the discussion and create practical resources as higher education transitions into an era of digital thought. It includes:
- General principles on AI in the Academy opens a new website
- What faculty and administrators need to know about AI opens a new website
- Syllabus Resources opens a new website
- Ideas for course activities opens a new website
- Guidance on creating course learning objectives opens a new website
- AI in the context of academic misconduct opens a new website
Additional Resources
-
UAB News Items
- With Microsoft's Copilot AI tool available to all Blazers, faculty prepare for fall 2024 opens a new website
- Love it or hate it, generative AI is not going away opens a new website
- Hands-on Review: What the president of a national a national group of writing program leaders thinks of ChatGPT opens a new website
- 5 prompts that explain how a writing professor flipped the script on AI opens a new website
- This business professor just gave his students an object lesson in trusting AI over human judgement opens a new website
-
Faculty Coffee Chat(GPT): AI and What To Do About It
This is a recording of an in-person event at the CTL on Friday, April 7, 2023, at the UAB Center for Teaching and Learning.
Watch Faculty Coffee Chat(GPT)Opens an external link.
Details:
AI technologies, including predictive text applications like ChatGPT, are having a major impact on college campuses. But the new technology is advancing so quickly that questions regarding academic integrity, authorship, copyright, and the impact of AI in our classes abound.
In this session, we will explore the development of AI, its current capabilities and limitations, and its impact and implications for faculty and our students. We will also provide updates on the progress of the Provost’s AI working group and seek input as UAB policies related to AI are developed and refined.
Slides from Dr. Ford's presentation can be found on the "attachments" tab.
-
Articles on AI in Higher Education
Nature
- Wells, S. (2024). Students speak out about AI in education opens a new website
The Chronicle of Higher Education
- AI Detection Is a Business. But Should It Be Faculty Business? opens a new website
- McMurtrie, B. (2023). Teaching, rethinking research papers, and other responses to ChatGPT opens a new website
- McMurtrie, B. (2023). Will CHATGPT change the way you teach? opens a new website
- McMurtrie, Supiano (2023). Caught Off Guard by AI opens a new website
Inside Higher Ed
- D’Agostino, Susan (2023) “Designing Assignments in the ChatGPT Era" opens a new website
- D’Agostino, S. (2023). ChatGPT advice academics can use now opens a new website
Times Higher Education: THE Campus
- McKnight, L. (2022). Eight ways to engage with AI Writers in Higher Education opens a new website
University World News
- Greenfield, Nathan M. (2023). "Facing Facts: ChatGPT can be a tool for critical thinking" opens a new website
- Special Report: AI and Higher Education opens a new website (A collection of articles related to AI in higher education)
Maclean’s
- Steipe, Boris (2023). "My students are using ChatGPT to write papers and answer exam questions—and I support it" opens a new website
SSRN (Social Science Research Network)
- Mollick, E. R., & Mollick, L. (2022). New Modes of Learning Enabled by AI Chatbots: Three Methods and Assignments opens a new website